WEIGHT-LOSS ADVERTISING: An Analysis of Current Trends

Executive Summary
This report attempts to take a comprehensive look at weight loss advertising. The need to
do so is compelling. In the last decade, the number of FTC law enforcement cases involving weight
loss products or services equaled those filed in the previous seven decades. Consumers spend
billions of dollars a year on weight loss products and services, money wasted if spent on worthless
remedies. This report highlights the scope of the problem facing consumers as they consider the
thousands of purported remedies on the market, as well as the serious challenge facing law
enforcement agencies attempting to prevent deceptive advertising.
According to the U.S. Surgeon General, overweight and obesity have reached epidemic
proportions, afflicting 6 out of every 10 Americans. Overweight and obesity constitute the second
leading cause of preventable death, after smoking, resulting in an estimated 300,000 deaths per
year. The costs, direct and indirect, associated with overweight and obesity are estimated to exceed
$100 billion a year.
At the same time, survey data suggest that millions of Americans are trying to lose weight.
The marketplace has responded with a proliferating array of products and services, many promising
miraculous, quick-fix remedies. Tens of millions of consumers have turned to over-the-counter
remedies, spending billions of dollars on products and services that purport to promote weight loss.
In the end, these quick-fixes do nothing to address the nation’s or the individual’s weight problem,
and, if anything, may contribute to an already serious health crisis.
Once the province of supermarket tabloids and the back sections of certain magazines,
over-the-top weight loss advertisements promising quick, easy weight loss are now pervasive in
almost all media forms. At least that is the impression. But are the obviously deceptive
advertisements really as widespread as they might appear watching late night television or leafing
through magazines at the local newsstand? To answer this and other questions, we collected and
analyzed a nonrandom sample of 300 advertisements, mostly disseminated during the first half of
2001, from broadcast and cable television, infomercials, radio, magazines, newspapers,
supermarket tabloids, direct mail, commercial e-mail (spam), and Internet websites. In addition, to
evaluate how weight-loss advertising has changed over the past decade, we collected ads
disseminated in 1992 in eight national magazines to compare with ads appearing in 2001 in the same
publications.
We conclude that false or misleading claims are common in weight-loss advertising, and,
based on our comparison of 1992 magazine ads with magazines ads for 2001, the number of
products and the amount of advertising, much of it deceptive, appears to have increased
dramatically over the last decade.
Of particular concern in ads in 2001 are grossly exaggerated or clearly unsubstantiated
viii
performance claims. Although we did not evaluate the substantiation for specific products and
advertising claims as part of this report, many of the claims we reviewed are so contrary to existing
scientific evidence, or so clearly unsupported by the available evidence, that there is little doubt that
they are false or deceptive. In addition to the obviously false claims, many other advertisements
contain claims that appear likely to be misleading or unsubstantiated.
Falling into the too-good-to-be-true category are claims that: the user can lose a pound a
day or more over extended periods of time; that substantial weight loss (without surgery) can be
achieved without diet or exercise; and that users can lose weight regardless of how much they eat.
Also falling into this category are claims that a diet pill can cause weight loss in selective parts of the
body or block absorption of all fat in the diet. These types of claims are simply inconsistent with
existing scientific knowledge.
This report catalogues the most common marketing techniques used in 300 weight loss
advertisements. Nearly all of the ads reviewed used at least one and sometimes several of the
following techniques, many of which should raise red flags about the veracity of the claims.